Multiple stents
IOP control good with one stent – and better with two or three


Roibeard O’hEineachain
Published: Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Antonio Maria Fea MD
In this present series of patients receiving a single stent or multiple stents as sole therapy, there was a sustained reduction in IOP with a reduction in drug burden in all patients through 30 monthsHowever, by 30 months the proportion requiring medication had risen to about 25% among those with only one stent, but remained unchanged in the other two treatment groups. The safety profile of the procedures was also favourable, Dr Fea said. There were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. In addition, postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was comparable in the three groups and was 20/40 or better in nearly 80% of eyes. There was a postoperative loss of one or more lines of BCVA in four eyes in the one-stent group, three eyes in the two-stent group and four eyes in the three-stent group, although nine of these 11 eyes had BCVA of 20/40 or better. Dr Fea noted that the findings of his study appear to confirm previous clinical observations that, as standalone procedures, implantation of one iStent achieves long-term, stable IOP control, and use of two or three iStents results in further IOP lowering than that achieved with a single stent. The enhanced IOP reduction may be due not only to each stent providing additional drainage of the aqueous. It may also result from the increased chance surgeons have of placing a stent in an optimum position in relation to collector channels of Schlemm’s canal, he said. To optimise the placement of the iStent implants, Dr Fea and his associates have devised a means of localising the collector channels by using a special dye. However, whether this will improve outcomes will not be known until the completion of randomised control trials. “In this present series of patients receiving a single stent or multiple stents as sole therapy, there was a sustained reduction in IOP with a reduction in drug burden in all patients through 30 months,” he concluded. Antonio Maria Fea: antoniofea@interfree.it
Latest Articles
Towards a Unified IOL Classification
The new IOL functional classification needs a strong and unified effort from surgeons, societies, and industry.
The 5 Ws of Post-Presbyopic IOL Enhancement
Fine-tuning refractive outcomes to meet patient expectations.
AI Shows Promise for Meibography Grading
Study demonstrates accuracy in detecting abnormalities and subtle changes in meibomian glands.
Are There Differences Between Male and Female Eyes?
TOGA Session panel underlined the need for more studies on gender differences.
Simulating Laser Vision Correction Outcomes
Individualised planning models could reduce ectasia risk and improve outcomes.
Need to Know: Aberrations, Aberrometry, and Aberropia
Understanding the nomenclature and techniques.
When Is It Time to Remove a Phakic IOL?
Close monitoring of endothelial cell loss in phakic IOL patients and timely explantation may avoid surgical complications.
Delivering Uncompromising Cataract Care
Expert panel considers tips and tricks for cataracts and compromised corneas.
Organising for Success
Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.