Measuring the biomechanics of the cornea

The correct measurement of the cornea’s biomechanical properties can have significant clinical applications

Measuring the biomechanics of the cornea
Leigh Spielberg
Leigh Spielberg
Published: Monday, February 13, 2017
[caption id="attachment_7529" align="alignnone" width="300"] Cynthia Roberts[/caption] The correct measurement of the cornea’s biomechanical properties can have significant clinical applications, from the measurement of intraocular pressure to the evaluation of progression in glaucoma and keratoconus. Cynthia Roberts, Ohio, USA, discussed the details of these properties at the 21st ESCRS Winter Meeting in Maastricht, The Netherlands.
The goal is to distinguish the effects of corneal biomechanic variables from the actual measurements sought, such as IOP.
After explaining the differences between elasticity, viscoscity and viscoelasticity, Dr Roberts focused on another property, hysteresis, a viscoelastic parameter with a time-dependent component that describes the difference in response during loading and unloading of a force on a tissue. This is of particular importance for pneumotonometry, which relies on analysis of the corneal biomechanical response to an air puff. The variables encountered can be complex, particularly in pathologic conditions, such as keratoconus, and in eyes that have undergone refractive surgery. Both conditions result in a lower level of hysteresis. Conversely, corneal cross-linking causes a stiffening of the cornea, as well as a corresponding increase in hysteresis. Two commercial pneumotonometry devices have been designed to analyse these responses: the Ocular Respons Analyzer (ORA; Reichert) and the Corvis ST (Oculus). The ORA can produce several different measurements, including the corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) and the Goldmann-correlated IOP. “The IOPcc is less affected by corneal thickness and properties,” said Dr Roberts, which means that IOP measurements should more accurately reflect the actual pressure inside the eye. The goal is to distinguish the effects of corneal biomechanic variables from the actual measurements sought, such as IOP.
Latest Articles
Towards a Unified IOL Classification

The new IOL functional classification needs a strong and unified effort from surgeons, societies, and industry.

Read more...

The 5 Ws of Post-Presbyopic IOL Enhancement

Fine-tuning refractive outcomes to meet patient expectations.

Read more...

AI Shows Promise for Meibography Grading

Study demonstrates accuracy in detecting abnormalities and subtle changes in meibomian glands.

Read more...

Are There Differences Between Male and Female Eyes?

TOGA Session panel underlined the need for more studies on gender differences.

Read more...

Simulating Laser Vision Correction Outcomes

Individualised planning models could reduce ectasia risk and improve outcomes.

Read more...

Mastering IOL Exchange

Tips and tricks for an uncomplicated replacement procedure.

Read more...

Need to Know: Aberrations, Aberrometry, and Aberropia

Understanding the nomenclature and techniques.

Read more...

When Is It Time to Remove a Phakic IOL?

Close monitoring of endothelial cell loss in phakic IOL patients and timely explantation may avoid surgical complications.

Read more...

Delivering Uncompromising Cataract Care

Expert panel considers tips and tricks for cataracts and compromised corneas.

Read more...

Organising for Success

Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.

Read more...