JUVENILE UVEITIS


Danielle Ledoux, of Boston Children’s Hospital in the US, presented the latest data on outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis treatment with biological agents at a joint session of the 2nd WCPOS and 12th EURETINA Congress. She reviewed data gathered from patients with her co-authors Rebecca Hunter and Anne Marie Lobo seen between 2006 and 2011 at two academic hospitals in Boston: the Uveitis Department of the Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary and the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Boston Children’s Hospital. Patients were followed for a minimum of six months. Sixty patients participated, of whom 30 underwent TNFα-inhibitor treatment and 30 did not. The two groups were statistically identical in terms of median age at presentation of systemic disease; median age at presentation of uveitis; gender; ANA positivity; and median length of follow-up.
In line with other studies presented at this session, all patients who eventually underwent TNFα-inhibitors therapy had previously been treated with a wide range of medications. These included not only methotrexate (100 per cent), topical steroids (97 per cent), non-steroidals (67 per cent) and oral steroids (50 per cent), but also mycophenolate mofetil (22 per cent), leflunomide (19 per cent), non-TNF biologicals (nine per cent), azathioprine (three per cent) and cyclosporine (three per cent). Once treated with TNFα-inhibitors, all three main drugs were used: infliximab (40 per cent); adalimumab (35 per cent); and etanercept (15 per cent). The remaining 10 per cent received “other†TNFα-inhibitors. Visual outcomes in patients on TNFα- inhibitors was encouraging: 82 per cent of patients achieved vision better than or equal to 20/40, while only a minority suffered vision between 20/50 and 20/150 (13 per cent), or worse than 20/200 (five per cent). On the other hand, ocular complications were clearly more common in those eyes treated with TNFα-inhibitors. These included cataract, posterior synechiae, cystoid macular oedema, glaucoma or ocular hypertension and band keratopathy. Because this was a retrospective study, this might be explained by the fact that there was a selection bias for TNFα-inhibitor therapy, with this treatment modality being reserved for those patients with more severe disease, Dr Ledoux noted.
Latest Articles
Towards a Unified IOL Classification
The new IOL functional classification needs a strong and unified effort from surgeons, societies, and industry.
The 5 Ws of Post-Presbyopic IOL Enhancement
Fine-tuning refractive outcomes to meet patient expectations.
AI Shows Promise for Meibography Grading
Study demonstrates accuracy in detecting abnormalities and subtle changes in meibomian glands.
Are There Differences Between Male and Female Eyes?
TOGA Session panel underlined the need for more studies on gender differences.
Simulating Laser Vision Correction Outcomes
Individualised planning models could reduce ectasia risk and improve outcomes.
Need to Know: Aberrations, Aberrometry, and Aberropia
Understanding the nomenclature and techniques.
When Is It Time to Remove a Phakic IOL?
Close monitoring of endothelial cell loss in phakic IOL patients and timely explantation may avoid surgical complications.
Delivering Uncompromising Cataract Care
Expert panel considers tips and tricks for cataracts and compromised corneas.
Organising for Success
Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.