JUVENILE UVEITIS


Danielle Ledoux, of Boston Children’s Hospital in the US, presented the latest data on outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis treatment with biological agents at a joint session of the 2nd WCPOS and 12th EURETINA Congress. She reviewed data gathered from patients with her co-authors Rebecca Hunter and Anne Marie Lobo seen between 2006 and 2011 at two academic hospitals in Boston: the Uveitis Department of the Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary and the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Boston Children’s Hospital. Patients were followed for a minimum of six months. Sixty patients participated, of whom 30 underwent TNFα-inhibitor treatment and 30 did not. The two groups were statistically identical in terms of median age at presentation of systemic disease; median age at presentation of uveitis; gender; ANA positivity; and median length of follow-up.
In line with other studies presented at this session, all patients who eventually underwent TNFα-inhibitors therapy had previously been treated with a wide range of medications. These included not only methotrexate (100 per cent), topical steroids (97 per cent), non-steroidals (67 per cent) and oral steroids (50 per cent), but also mycophenolate mofetil (22 per cent), leflunomide (19 per cent), non-TNF biologicals (nine per cent), azathioprine (three per cent) and cyclosporine (three per cent). Once treated with TNFα-inhibitors, all three main drugs were used: infliximab (40 per cent); adalimumab (35 per cent); and etanercept (15 per cent). The remaining 10 per cent received “other†TNFα-inhibitors. Visual outcomes in patients on TNFα- inhibitors was encouraging: 82 per cent of patients achieved vision better than or equal to 20/40, while only a minority suffered vision between 20/50 and 20/150 (13 per cent), or worse than 20/200 (five per cent). On the other hand, ocular complications were clearly more common in those eyes treated with TNFα-inhibitors. These included cataract, posterior synechiae, cystoid macular oedema, glaucoma or ocular hypertension and band keratopathy. Because this was a retrospective study, this might be explained by the fact that there was a selection bias for TNFα-inhibitor therapy, with this treatment modality being reserved for those patients with more severe disease, Dr Ledoux noted.
Latest Articles
Simulators Benefit Surgeons and Patients
Helping young surgeons build confidence and expertise.
How Many Surgeries Equal Surgical Proficiency?
Internet, labs, simulators, and assisting surgery all contribute.
Improving Clinical Management for nAMD and DME
Global survey data identify barriers and opportunities.
Are Postoperative Topical Antibiotic Drops Still Needed?
Cataract surgeons debate the benefits of intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis.
Emerging Technology for Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus
Brillouin microscopy shows promise in clinical studies.
Knowing Iris Repair: Modified Trifold Technique
Part eight of our series covers the modified trifold technique for large iris defects.
It’s All About Biomechanics!
Increasing the pool of patients eligible for refractive surgery.
Uncovering More Safe and Quick Options
Different strategies, such as PresbyLASIK, can offer presbyopes good outcomes.
Topography-Guided PRK for Keratoconus
Improving visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.
Defining AMD Treatment Protocol
Treatments trending to fewer injections for better results.