ESCRS - Iris-fixated IOLs have several fixation options

Iris-fixated IOLs have several fixation options

Iris-fixated IOLs have several fixation options
Leigh Spielberg
Leigh Spielberg
Published: Friday, September 9, 2016
[caption id="attachment_5244" align="alignnone" width="750"]euretina%ef%80%a2escrs-main_-spalton_1884-1024x705 Professor David Spalton at the combined ESCRS/EURETINA symposium[/caption]   “Our colleagues in The Netherlands have enormous experience with iris-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs),” said David J Spalton FRCS, FRCP, FRCOphth, UK, when introducing Rudy MMA Nuijts MD, PhD, The Netherlands, prior to Dr Nuijts’ presentation at a combined EURETINA/ESCRS session in Copenhagen yesterday. “Iris-fixated IOLs eliminate the problems with IOL sizing or damage to the anterior chamber (AC) angle that can be associated with AC IOLs. They’re a one-size-fits-all solution in the absence of capsular support,” said Dr Nuijts. Iris-fixated IOLs have several fixation options. They can be attached to the anterior or posterior face of the iris in horizontal, vertical or oblique orientations, depending on the status of the iris tissue. Dr Nuijts prefers retropupillary fixation. “It’s clear that the further the lens is away from the corneal endothelium, the better,” he said, since “annualised corneal endothelial cell loss is 2-3% for anteriorly-fixated IOLs.” Complications specific to iris-fixated IOLs include anterior uveitis, iris depigmentation, pupillar distortion and spontaneous lens dislocation. These, however, compare favorably with complications due to intrascleral fixation of posterior chamber IOLs, which require more complicated surgery to implant and can lead to damage to the ciliary body and retinal detachment. In addition to complicated cataract cases, iris-fixated IOLs can be used in patients operated for congenital cataract and lens subluxation in Marfan’s syndrome. Despite a long history of good results to date, Dr Nuijts pointed out the need for prospective, long-term studies to compare iris-fixated versus sclera-fixated IOLs.
Latest Articles
Simulators Benefit Surgeons and Patients

Helping young surgeons build confidence and expertise.

Read more...

How Many Surgeries Equal Surgical Proficiency?

Internet, labs, simulators, and assisting surgery all contribute.

Read more...

Improving Clinical Management for nAMD and DME

Global survey data identify barriers and opportunities.

Read more...

Are Postoperative Topical Antibiotic Drops Still Needed?

Cataract surgeons debate the benefits of intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis.

Read more...

Emerging Technology for Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus

Brillouin microscopy shows promise in clinical studies.

Read more...

Knowing Iris Repair: Modified Trifold Technique

Part eight of our series covers the modified trifold technique for large iris defects.

Read more...

It’s All About Biomechanics!

Increasing the pool of patients eligible for refractive surgery.

Read more...

Uncovering More Safe and Quick Options

Different strategies, such as PresbyLASIK, can offer presbyopes good outcomes.

Read more...

Topography-Guided PRK for Keratoconus

Improving visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.

Read more...

Defining AMD Treatment Protocol

Treatments trending to fewer injections for better results.

Read more...