ESCRS - DSO Shows Promise in Treating Fuchs' Dystrophy
Cornea, Corneal Therapeutics

DSO Shows Promise in Treating Fuchs' Dystrophy

Improved results were seen with no rejection concerns.

DSO Shows Promise in Treating Fuchs' Dystrophy

Impressive surgical advances have been made in Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) treatment over the past 25 years, with ongoing insights into the biology and genetics of the disease potentially paving the way to an eventual medical therapy of the condition in our lifetime, according to Kathryn Colby MD, PhD.

Speaking at the EuCornea Congress in Paris, Dr Colby focused her presentation on the exciting possibilities of descemet stripping only (DSO) as a viable treatment for some patients with FECD.

“Over the past 25 years, we have seen a shift in the way we manage Fuchs’ dystrophy surgically,” she said. “We don’t do penetrating keratoplasty anymore, and 2023 was the first year in the United States that Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) actually exceeded the numbers of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) procedures for endothelial dysfunction. Since 2014, we have really ushered in the era of modern DSO for treating the disease with results that continue to improve.”

As with every surgical treatment, DSO has its advantages and downsides.

“DMEK is a wonderful surgery with quick visual recovery, but there is still a 6% rejection rate without steroids,” Dr Colby explained. “With DSO, there is no foreign tissue needed and therefore no rejection risk and no risks of long-term steroids. It is a straightforward surgical technique that removes central corneal guttae known to be visually significant.”

On the downside, DSO is not a universal treatment for all FECD cases.

“If the patient has limbus to limbus guttae, they will not do well with DSO. In our original series, we had about a 75% success rate. This was before the era of rho kinase inhibitor (ROCK) supplementation, and some series now approach 100%, but we are not quite there yet.”

Visual rehabilitation and durability of treatment also need to be considered, she said.

“We need to bear in mind that immediately [after] surgery, there will be worse vision after DSO. We remove the endothelium and Descemet membrane, so there will be corneal oedema. The duration of the effect is also not known. The remaining endothelial cells that repopulated the central cornea still have the disease. However, my index patient is now 10 years out from treatment and is still doing well.”

Dr Colby offered three tips to maximise outcomes from DSO treatments: patient selection, surgical technique, and ROCK inhibitor supplementation.

“Patients [need] to have predominantly central guttae with a preserved peripheral endothelial mosaic,” she said. “They [must] be able to tolerate reduced vision for three to six weeks after DSO, and they have to be willing to have an endothelial keratoplasty if the DSO is not successful.”

In surgical technique, Dr Colby advised removing as many of the central confluent guttae as possible but proceeding very gently with the surgery. “If you put a surgical hook into the posterior corneal stroma, you will cause scarring. Additionally, it is best to aim for a smooth-edged tear and to try to centre the descemetorhexis on the visual axis,” she said.

Finally, she advised using a ROCK inhibitor after DSO surgery. “Both ripasudil and netarsudil have been shown to speed corneal clearance and increase final endothelial cell count after DSO in investigator-initiated series.”

Ripasudil has already successfully completed a multinational phase II trial, with patients currently enrolling for randomised phase III trials with the aim of FDA approval.

Looking to the future, Dr Colby suggested DSO might be combined with new therapies for even better outcomes.

“We know the corneal guttae themselves are visually significant. DSO offers a nice option [for combination] with some new therapies that may improve endothelial cell function or reduce the continued dysfunction of the cells,” she said. “In development right now are a bio-engineered fibroblastic growth factor and small molecules which can inhibit the downstream effect of repeat expansion underlying the bulk of FECD.”

Kathryn Colby MD, PhD is the Elisabeth J Cohen Professor and Chairman of the Department of Ophthalmology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, US. Kathryn.Colby@nyulangone.org

 

 

Tags: cornea, FECD, Fuchs' dystrophy, DSO, descemet stripping only, DMEK, DSAEK, endothelial dysfunction, Kathryn Colby
Latest Articles
Diamonds in the Rough

The push for inclusivity in ophthalmology.

Read more...

Making Female Leadership More than a Moment

A remarkable global confluence of women in key positions.

Read more...

ESCRS Talks Technology at AAO

Europe adopts technological advances, US still waiting for lenses and lasers.

Read more...

Sorting Out Simultaneous Vision IOLs

The ESCRS Eye Journal Club discuss a new landmark paper on IOL classification and the need for harmonisation of terminology for presbyopic IOLs.

Read more...

Big Advantages to Small-Aperture IOLs

Small-aperture IOLs offer superior image quality with increased range of focus.

Read more...

Prioritising Self-Care

Benefits of maintaining physical, emotional, and mental health extend beyond the personal sphere.

Read more...

Valuing Clinical Trial Design

How inclusivity and diversity can enhance scientific accuracy in research.

Read more...

Knowing Iris Repair: Using Iridodiathermy in Iris Surgery

Prepare for decentred pupils and uneven irides in multiple situations.

Read more...

Neuroprotectant Treatment for MacTel Type 2

Intravitreal implant releasing ciliary neurotrophic factor found safe and effective in pivotal trials.

Read more...

Supplement: Maximizing Visual Quality in Refractive Surgery Through Enhanced Precision and Safety

Read more...