ESCRS - Cost-benefit study of CXL

Cost-benefit study of CXL

A 10-year treatment effect justifies CXL in progressive keratoconus

Cost-benefit study of CXL
Roibeard O’hEineachain
Roibeard O’hEineachain
Published: Tuesday, June 6, 2017
[caption id="attachment_8414" align="alignnone" width="325"]Daniel A Godefrooij MD Daniel A Godefrooij MD[/caption] Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is cost-effective in the treatment of patients with progressive keratoconus, suggests a comparison study presented at the 21st ESCRS Winter Meeting in Maastricht, The Netherlands. Using a probabilistic-type stochastic Markov-type model, the study compared two identical cohorts, each including 1,000 virtual patients with progressive bilateral keratoconus. One cohort received CXL and the other cohort received no initial intervention, said Daniel A Godefrooij MD, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. He noted that the study modelled the patients and their virtual annual evaluations based on data from published trials and cohort studies over a lifetime. They took into account disease progression, and the probability of corneal transplantation and/or graft failure. The analysis showed that, assuming a 10-year duration of effect, CXL is cost-effective for progressive keratoconus at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €115,518, which is three times the current gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Moreover, assuming a longer stabilising effect of CXL would increase the cost-effectiveness, Dr Godefrooij noted. “We assumed that the longest duration of crosslinking effectiveness will be 10 years, which is the longest follow-up published, but we did not see a degeneration of the crosslinking effect, so it's plausible that the effect is longer than 10 years,” he said. He noted that assuming a 10-year effect of CXL, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) – the difference in cost between two possible interventions divided by the difference in their effect – was €54,384 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). However, when they adjusted the stabilising effect of CXL to have a lifelong duration, the ICER decreased to €10,149/QALY. “That means the cost of one QALY is under the per capita GDP threshold and thus very cost-effective,” he said. Dr Godefrooij noted that the ability to maximise cost-effectiveness of CXL is limited by the difficulty in determining who will benefit most from CXL and who will benefit least. Not all keratoconus patients will require keratoplasty in their lifetime, and contact lenses may be all they will ever require. “A better defined indication for crosslinking would also improve cost-effectiveness,” he added. Daniel A Godefrooij: d.a.godefrooij@umcutrecht.nl
Latest Articles
Diamonds in the Rough

The push for inclusivity in ophthalmology.

Read more...

Making Female Leadership More than a Moment

A remarkable global confluence of women in key positions.

Read more...

ESCRS Talks Technology at AAO

Europe adopts technological advances, US still waiting for lenses and lasers.

Read more...

Sorting Out Simultaneous Vision IOLs

The ESCRS Eye Journal Club discuss a new landmark paper on IOL classification and the need for harmonisation of terminology for presbyopic IOLs.

Read more...

Big Advantages to Small-Aperture IOLs

Small-aperture IOLs offer superior image quality with increased range of focus.

Read more...

Prioritising Self-Care

Benefits of maintaining physical, emotional, and mental health extend beyond the personal sphere.

Read more...

Valuing Clinical Trial Design

How inclusivity and diversity can enhance scientific accuracy in research.

Read more...

Knowing Iris Repair: Using Iridodiathermy in Iris Surgery

Prepare for decentred pupils and uneven irides in multiple situations.

Read more...

Neuroprotectant Treatment for MacTel Type 2

Intravitreal implant releasing ciliary neurotrophic factor found safe and effective in pivotal trials.

Read more...

Supplement: Maximizing Visual Quality in Refractive Surgery Through Enhanced Precision and Safety

Read more...