ESCRS - Modern IOL calculation formulas remain the best choice ;

Modern IOL calculation formulas remain the best choice

Artificial intelligence does not replace nor is better than traditional formulas

Modern IOL calculation formulas remain the best choice
Priscilla Lynch
Priscilla Lynch
Published: Monday, September 16, 2019
[caption id="attachment_16691" align="alignnone" width="1024"] Graham Barrett[/caption]

Modern intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the latest-generation formulas remain the best choice for ophthalmic surgeons today, Graham Barrett MD, Australia, argued during the Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Symposium ‘Controversies in Cataract and Refractive Surgery’ session yesterday.

Dr Barrett, who created the widely-used Barrett formulas (based on Gaussian formulas) for IOL power calculation, maintained that artificial intelligence does not replace nor is better than traditional formulas.

He said that using the latest-generation traditional formulas with the more accurate data and measurements we have access to today, and utilising additional parameters has made calculations better and more accurate. Looking to the future, he said that formulas could add parameters like age and race to further refine accuracy.

Dr Barrett cited a number of comparison studies of various formulas to support his argument, including data comparing the prediction accuracy of 297 consecutive cases using two or three parameters (older traditional formulas) versus five parameters (Barrett Universal II formula), which showed superior predictions for his formula across all measurements.

“I think there is a misconception that the tag ‘AI’ endows some magic to the process of assessing data to refine outcomes,” he commented, adding that no one really understands what happens exactly inside the “black box” of artificial intelligence algorithms.

Dr Barrett said while there were benefits to both approaches, he believes the latest traditional theoretical formulas utilising paraxial ray tracing and polynomial regression are superior. The best formulas “should be flexible enough to be able to utilise more useful information and add in new parameters as they become available” to further improve their accuracy, he said.

Concluding, Dr Barrett said theoretical formula versions that utilise “every drop of knowledge” are the best choice for the most accurate IOL power calculations across the range of surgical needs.

Tags: iol power calculation
Latest Articles
Overcoming Barriers to Presbyopic IOL Uptake

Improving technology, patient and doctor awareness, and reimbursement are keys.

Read more...

Battling Bias in Science

Hidden biases in science impact careers and patient care.

Read more...

Training in the Digital Era

AI-powered, cloud-based system can effectively improve traineeship, save time, and increase performance.

Read more...

Treating Myopia, Inside and Outside

Lifestyle changes and ophthalmic interventions play a role in treating paediatric myopia.

Read more...

The Promises and Pitfalls of AI

While AI shows potential in healthcare, experts agree it requires bias mitigation and human oversight.

Read more...

Visual Rehabilitation for Keratoconus

Concepts regarding best techniques shift based on learnings from longer follow-up.

Read more...

Discovering Prodygy and Nirvana

New gene-agnostic treatments for inheritable retinal disease.

Read more...

Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Corneal Disease

Applying information from preoperative diagnostics guides surgical planning.

Read more...

Supplement: Integrating Presbyopia-Correction into the Everyday Cataract Practice

Read more...

ESCRS Research Projects Make a Difference

EPICAT study continues tradition of practice-changing clinical studies.

Read more...