Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate

Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia

Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate
Howard Larkin
Howard Larkin
Published: Tuesday, October 30, 2018
[caption id="attachment_13293" align="alignnone" width="1024"] MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, Jan Willem de Cler, head of surgical ophthalmology at Carl Zeiss Meditec and Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital discuss developing IOL technologies at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018[/caption] Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia, according to presenters at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018. However, designing successful accommodating IOLs remains daunting, said Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital. Several mechanical and flexible gel lens IOL designs have lost accommodative range over time due to capsule fibrosis, and lens mineralisation has developed as much as five years after implant, he noted. Detecting such problems lengthens development time, but is necessary, Dr Stevens added. “Given that we are implanting these lenses in younger people for refractive reasons, how much safety and efficacy data do you need, how long do you wait before you say ‘yes, that’s it?’” He believes electronic accommodating IOLs will be the solution, though battery technology must improve to provide a 40- to 50-year lifespan. Alcon are making progress on electronic accommodating IOLs and contact lenses, noted Laurent Attias, senior vice president for corporate development at the Novartis division. “The battery technology is not that far off. … we’ve seen improvements from four years to 20 years.” MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, is not willing to write off mechanical and shape-changing designs. Every technology has its advantages and limits and all are at an early stage, he said. “We need to push forward on every front.”
Tags: IOLs
Latest Articles
Addressing Postoperative Visual Complications

Managing aberrations after laser refractive surgery requires a multi-layered approach.

Read more...

3D Printing Helps Transform Ukrainian Eye Care

The country’s ophthalmologists offer valuable experience in treating ocular trauma and prosthesis design.

Read more...

Winning Essay Says ‘Collective Desire’ Must Drive DEI Implementation

Read more...

Emerging Microbial Trends That Could Affect Your Practices

A triptych of challenges paints a concerning picture for ophthalmologists across the globe.

Read more...

Improving Outcomes with Laser-Assisted Surgery

Femtosecond laser offers a multifunctional tool for improving the safety and efficacy of cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures.

Read more...

Could the Corneal Transplant Pool Increase?

Modifying or discarding major contraindications for keratoplasty could mean more patients have their sight restored.

Read more...

Matching Premium IOLs to Visual Lifestyles

From monofocal to full-range solutions, each practice needs comprehensive understanding.

Read more...

Going Dutch on Acanthamoeba Keratitis

A world-first trial suggests a new medication could beat the disease.

Read more...

Avoiding Intracorneal Ring Segment Complications

Femtosecond lasers are helping improve refractive results with fewer problems.

Read more...

Fine-Tuning IOLs After Surgery

Lens power adjustment technology is developing quickly.

Read more...