Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate

Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia

Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate
Howard Larkin
Howard Larkin
Published: Tuesday, October 30, 2018
[caption id="attachment_13293" align="alignnone" width="1024"] MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, Jan Willem de Cler, head of surgical ophthalmology at Carl Zeiss Meditec and Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital discuss developing IOL technologies at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018[/caption] Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia, according to presenters at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018. However, designing successful accommodating IOLs remains daunting, said Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital. Several mechanical and flexible gel lens IOL designs have lost accommodative range over time due to capsule fibrosis, and lens mineralisation has developed as much as five years after implant, he noted. Detecting such problems lengthens development time, but is necessary, Dr Stevens added. “Given that we are implanting these lenses in younger people for refractive reasons, how much safety and efficacy data do you need, how long do you wait before you say ‘yes, that’s it?’” He believes electronic accommodating IOLs will be the solution, though battery technology must improve to provide a 40- to 50-year lifespan. Alcon are making progress on electronic accommodating IOLs and contact lenses, noted Laurent Attias, senior vice president for corporate development at the Novartis division. “The battery technology is not that far off. … we’ve seen improvements from four years to 20 years.” MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, is not willing to write off mechanical and shape-changing designs. Every technology has its advantages and limits and all are at an early stage, he said. “We need to push forward on every front.”
Tags: IOLs
Latest Articles
Nutrition and the Eye: A Recipe for Success

A look at the evidence for tasty ways of lowering risks and improving ocular health.

Read more...

New Award to Encourage Research into Sustainable Practices

Read more...

Sharing a Vision for the Future

ESCRS leaders update Trieste conference on ESCRS initiatives.

Read more...

Extending Depth of Satisfaction

The ESCRS Eye Journal Club discuss a new study reviewing the causes and management of dissatisfaction after implantation of an EDOF IOL.

Read more...

Conventional Versus Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery

Evidence favours conventional technique in most cases.

Read more...

AI Scribing and Telephone Management

Automating note-taking and call centres could boost practice efficiency.

Read more...

AI Analysis and the Cornea

A combination of better imaging and AI deep learning could significantly improve corneal imaging and diagnosis.

Read more...

Cooking a Feast for the Eyes

A cookbook to promote ocular health through thoughtful and traditional cuisine.

Read more...

Need to Know: Spherical Aberration

Part three of this series examines spherical aberration and its influence on higher-order aberrations.

Read more...

Generating AI’s Potential

How generative AI impacts medicine, society, and the environment.

Read more...