Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate

Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia

Ophthalmology Futures Forum IOL debate
Howard Larkin
Howard Larkin
Published: Tuesday, October 30, 2018
[caption id="attachment_13293" align="alignnone" width="1024"] MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, Jan Willem de Cler, head of surgical ophthalmology at Carl Zeiss Meditec and Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital discuss developing IOL technologies at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018[/caption] Multiple accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) technologies will continue developing over the next few years as industry and ocular surgeons seek better treatments for presbyopia, according to presenters at Ophthalmology Futures Forum Vienna 2018. However, designing successful accommodating IOLs remains daunting, said Julian Stevens MRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth, DO of Moorfields Eye Hospital. Several mechanical and flexible gel lens IOL designs have lost accommodative range over time due to capsule fibrosis, and lens mineralisation has developed as much as five years after implant, he noted. Detecting such problems lengthens development time, but is necessary, Dr Stevens added. “Given that we are implanting these lenses in younger people for refractive reasons, how much safety and efficacy data do you need, how long do you wait before you say ‘yes, that’s it?’” He believes electronic accommodating IOLs will be the solution, though battery technology must improve to provide a 40- to 50-year lifespan. Alcon are making progress on electronic accommodating IOLs and contact lenses, noted Laurent Attias, senior vice president for corporate development at the Novartis division. “The battery technology is not that far off. … we’ve seen improvements from four years to 20 years.” MK Raheja, head of ophthalmic implant R&D for Johnson & Johnson, is not willing to write off mechanical and shape-changing designs. Every technology has its advantages and limits and all are at an early stage, he said. “We need to push forward on every front.”
Tags: IOLs
Latest Articles
Organising for Success

Professional and personal goals drive practice ownership and operational choices.

Read more...

Update on Astigmatism Analysis

Read more...

Is Frugal Innovation Possible in Ophthalmology?

Improving access through financially and environmentally sustainable innovation.

Read more...

iNovation Innovators Den Boosts Eye Care Pioneers

New ideas and industry, colleague, and funding contacts among the benefits.

Read more...

From Concept to Clinic

Partnerships with academia and industry promote innovation.

Read more...

José Güell: Trends in Cornea Treatment

Endothelial damage, cellular treatments, human tissue, and infections are key concerns on the horizon.

Read more...

Making IOLs a More Personal Choice

Surgeons may prefer some IOLs for their patients, but what about for themselves?

Read more...

Need to Know: Higher-Order Aberrations and Polynomials

This first instalment in a tutorial series will discuss more on the measurement and clinical implications of HOAs.

Read more...

Never Go In Blind

Novel ophthalmic block simulator promises higher rates of confidence and competence in trainees.

Read more...

Simulators Benefit Surgeons and Patients

Helping young surgeons build confidence and expertise.

Read more...