Great innovation starts and ends with the patient

Innovation is a process not an outcome, with the roots of true innovation stemming from a desire to change the status quo for the better, said Mark Blumenkranz MD, MMS, who delivered the Kreissig Lecture at the 13th EURETINA Congress.
In a wide-ranging review of the principles of innovation and how they can be applied in the field of retinal research, Dr Blumenkranz said that the celebrated “eureka” moment is only the initial step in a long journey to effect real change.
“Innovation is really the systematic search for solutions to unsolved problems and unmet needs that are also practical and affordable. Creativity alone is not enough. Successful innovation requires discipline and the ability to think both inside and outside the box equally well. It requires iteration and constant feedback not simply inspiration or momentary genius. This is intrinsically difficult because it asks us to break out of our zone of comfort and do things differently,” he said.
In biomedical innovation every great innovation starts and ends with the patient and an unmet need, said Dr Blumenkranz. “The roots of innovation really stem from a desire to change the status quo for the better. However, this may well be viewed as an undesirable, and at times subversive activity. It requires a willingness to move away from conventional wisdom and reach outside one’s comfort zone. It may consist of asking questions or engaging in actions viewed as provocative,” he said.
An idea must be practical and commercially viable enough to successfully replace existing methods, said Dr Blumenkranz, noting that many obstacles such as habits, fear and cost exist to limit the diffusion of new technology.
This early gap in the diffusion of innovation over time was termed the “chasm” by Geoffrey A Moore, who said that crossing the chasm can be both difficult and dangerous.
The pharmaceutical industry, academia and clinicians make up the traditional innovation ecosystem for biomedical science, said Dr Blumenkranz, who said that the boundaries and capabilities of the biomedical research enterprise and delivery system are increasingly blurred and shifting.
* A full report of Dr Blumenkranz’s lecture will appear in a future edition of EuroTimes.
Tags: intraocular pressure, optic nerve, quality control
Latest Articles
Simulators Benefit Surgeons and Patients
Helping young surgeons build confidence and expertise.
How Many Surgeries Equal Surgical Proficiency?
Internet, labs, simulators, and assisting surgery all contribute.
Improving Clinical Management for nAMD and DME
Global survey data identify barriers and opportunities.
Are Postoperative Topical Antibiotic Drops Still Needed?
Cataract surgeons debate the benefits of intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis.
Emerging Technology for Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus
Brillouin microscopy shows promise in clinical studies.
Knowing Iris Repair: Modified Trifold Technique
Part eight of our series covers the modified trifold technique for large iris defects.
It’s All About Biomechanics!
Increasing the pool of patients eligible for refractive surgery.
Uncovering More Safe and Quick Options
Different strategies, such as PresbyLASIK, can offer presbyopes good outcomes.
Topography-Guided PRK for Keratoconus
Improving visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.
Defining AMD Treatment Protocol
Treatments trending to fewer injections for better results.