ESCRS - Femtosecond Laser Clear Corneal Incisions

Femtosecond Laser Clear Corneal Incisions

Femtosecond Laser Clear Corneal Incisions

Multiplanar incisions are repeatable and demonstrate excellent wound apposition and tight sealing immediately post-op and up to three months after surgery

This is certainly an exciting time in the development of laser applications for cataract surgery. Surgeons have a great deal to consider, though, in deciding which technologies might benefit our patients and our practices. So far, I remain somewhat skeptical about the potential return on investment from adding a second, cataract-only femtosecond laser to my practice.

[caption id='attachment_54' align='alignright' width='272' caption='Fig 1a-c: One can see precise wound apposition in OCT images of a 3-step clear corneal incision created with a femtosecond laser, 30 minutes post-op (a), 1 day post-op (b) and 1 week post-op (c)'][/caption]

However, I am interested in the clinical benefits of laser-assisted cataract surgery and the practice advantages of being able to market bladeless surgery. I think we may get the biggest “bang for the buck†in both areas from corneal applications of femtosecond technology, including clear corneal incisions and arcuate intrastromal incisions for the correction of astigmatism.

We already have extensive experience with corneal femtosecond lasers, with more than five million femtosecond LASIK procedures globally to date. Eliminating bladed incisions is the part of laser cataract surgery that I believe will be most appealing and easiest for patients to understand, while at the same time potentially reducing risk and improving outcomes.

And, of course, laser cataract surgery is a much more reasonable proposition financially for surgeon and patient if we can utilise the lasers we already have. For all these reasons, I have been investigating cataract surgery applications for my current femtosecond lasers (FS60 and iFS, Abbott Medical Optics).

Clear corneal incisions

We have now performed laser CCIs in 16 eyes, with three-month data available for 10 eyes. In the first few eyes, I made a straight, 30° entry angle into the anterior chamber. Although the wounds looked good and all these eyes achieved good results, two had Seidel wound leaks on day one, so we refined the technique to achieve better wound sealing.

My current approach relies on the IntraLase-enabled keratoplasty (IEK) software along with a mask to control the incision size at 2.3 or 2.6mm. This represents an off- label use of approved technology in the US. I create a three-step, multiplanar incision that is much stronger than my initial uniplanar incisions. There is very precise wound apposition and sealing, as can be seen on postoperative OCT images (Figures 1a-c).

At three months post-op, all eyes had BCVA of 20/20 or better. There was no trauma to Descemet’s and no problems in either group with wound leak or incision gaping while the femtosecond laser suction was on.

Similar to bladeless LASIK, femtosecond laser CCIs offer a theoretically lower risk of complications such as wound leaks and early or late ingress of tear fluid into the anterior chamber. It may even reduce the risk of endophthalmitis that has been associated with CCIs in the past.

Arcuate incisions

We have also treated three eyes with intrastromal arcuate incisions using the iFS laser. Initial post-op day one results were very good. The hope and expectation is that the astigmatic correction will endure over time. Immediately post-op, there is a very interesting separation of the incision by the opaque bubble layer on OCT. To me, this is a good indication that, while the cornea anterior and posterior to the incision is intact, there is a distinct separation of the corneal lamellae in the desired location.

If the procedure proves to be predictable and effective, I see a number of advantages in performing astigmatic corrections with a laser instead of a diamond blade. It will be much easier to make incisions at the exact optical zone, arc and depth desired and to achieve perfect symmetry between paired incisions – something that is nearly impossible by hand. Furthermore, by not opening the epithelium, we limit the risk of infection, corneal melt and epithelial ingrowth into the wound.

Dr Loden is in private practice at Loden Vision Centers in Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Contact him at: lodenmd@ lodenvision.com. 

 

 

Latest Articles
Simulators Benefit Surgeons and Patients

Helping young surgeons build confidence and expertise.

Read more...

Diamonds in the Rough

The push for inclusivity in ophthalmology.

Read more...

Making Female Leadership More than a Moment

A remarkable global confluence of women in key positions.

Read more...

ESCRS Talks Technology at AAO

Europe adopts technological advances, US still waiting for lenses and lasers.

Read more...

Sorting Out Simultaneous Vision IOLs

The ESCRS Eye Journal Club discuss a new landmark paper on IOL classification and the need for harmonisation of terminology for presbyopic IOLs.

Read more...

Big Advantages to Small-Aperture IOLs

Small-aperture IOLs offer superior image quality with increased range of focus.

Read more...

Prioritising Self-Care

Benefits of maintaining physical, emotional, and mental health extend beyond the personal sphere.

Read more...

Valuing Clinical Trial Design

How inclusivity and diversity can enhance scientific accuracy in research.

Read more...

Knowing Iris Repair: Using Iridodiathermy in Iris Surgery

Prepare for decentred pupils and uneven irides in multiple situations.

Read more...

Neuroprotectant Treatment for MacTel Type 2

Intravitreal implant releasing ciliary neurotrophic factor found safe and effective in pivotal trials.

Read more...