Accuracy Of Various Barrett Formulae In Keratoconus Patients
Published 2022
- 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP13.08
| Type: ESCRS 2022 - Posters
| DOI:
10.82333/e8bw-pf50
Authors:
Vaishal Kenia* 1
, Raj Kenia 1
, Sneha Maru 1
, Laxmi Mudaliya 1
1KENIA EYE HOSPITAL,MUMBAI,India
Purpose
To compare accuracy of various Barrett formulae in keratoconus patients
Setting
Private Eye Hospital, India
Methods
A retrospective study where keratoconus subjects diagnosed with keratoconus (Central and Grade 1 <48.00D), age ranged between 45-75 years were enrolled. Subjects with any systemic illness, previous corneal surgery, Intraoperative complications were excluded. Post operative 1 month refraction was noted. IOL power calculations were done using Barret (Barrett Univarsal 2 (Bar U2), Barrett total K (BarTK), Barrett True K (Bar TRK) and measured Barrett True K (Mea Bar TRK) formulae. Median Absolute error (MedAE) was calculated median of absolute difference between post operative and target refraction spherical equivalent. Also percentage of eyes with absolute error spherical equivalent within 0.5D, >0.51 D were noted.
Results
23 eyes with mean±SD age 62.21±7.0 years were included. All the Barrett variants resulted in similar refractive outcomes. Median Absolute error with Bar 2, BarTK, Pred Bar TRK, and Mea Bar TRK was 0.33, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.26D respectively. With all four variant of Barrett, 78.26% and 21.74% eyes had spherical equivalent within 0.50D and >0.51D respectively.
Conclusions
Barrett true K resulted in minimal post operative refractive error and Barrett Total K had an advantage over Universal 2.