Comparative Outcomes Of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy And Traditional Photorefractive Keratectomy In The Correction Of Myopic Astigmatism
Published 2022
- 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PP09.12
| Type: Free paper
| DOI:
10.82333/gvtk-5z80
Authors:
Omur Ucakhan* 1
, Tuna Celik Buyuktepe 2
, Rukiye Kasimoglu 1
1Department of Ophthalmology,Ankara University School of Medicine,Ankara,Türkiye, 2Department of Ophthalmology,Ankara University School of Medicine,Ankara,Türkiye;Department of Ophthalmology,Ünye State Hospital,Ordu,Türkiye
Purpose
To compare the clinical outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) to standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the correction of myopic astigmatism.
Setting
Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Methods
Consecutive myopic astigmatism patients who underwent single-step tPRK with StreamLight protocol (Alcon Inc., USA) or PRK with mechanical epithelial debridement using WaveLight EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Inc., USA) were included in this observational case-series. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity functions, corneal topographic and aberrometric findings were evaluated at baseline and postoperative 1 month. Postoperative pain and photophobia were assessed by patient-reported 0-10 scores.
Results
Ten eyes of 5 patients with the median age of 29.5±6.7 years (range: 39-21 years) were treated with tPRK and 10 eyes of 5 patients with the mean age of 34.2±8.5 years (range: 44-21) were treated with PRK. Postoperative pain and photophobia scores and duration of pain did not differ significantly between the two groups. At postoperative 1 month, UDVA was 20/20 in 90% of eyes in tPRK and 80% in PRK groups, whereas the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.18±0.31 D and -0.35±0.38 D, respectively. Postoperative mesopic contrast sensitivities were measured as 0.30±0.0 logCS and 0.25±0.09 logCS without glare, 0.26±0.05 logCS and 0.23±0.07 logCS with glare in eyes treated with tPRK or PRK, respectively (p>0.05).
Conclusions
In our pilot case-series, single-step tPRK with the new StreamLight platform was found to be effective in the treatment of myopic astigmatism. Visual, refractive, topographic and aberrometric outcomes were comparable to standard PRK, with slightly higher mesopic contrast sensitivity. Studies with more number of patients are required to determine the efficacy of this new tPRK platform.