ESCRS - PP05.04 - Using Inter-Session Reliability To Estimate The Minimal Detectable Change For Indices Of Progression In Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug Tomography

Using Inter-Session Reliability To Estimate The Minimal Detectable Change For Indices Of Progression In Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug Tomography

Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS

Reference: PP05.04 | Type: ESCRS 2022 - Posters | DOI: 10.82333/ecnf-9813

Authors: Anastasios Sepetis* 1 , Chris Schulz 1 , Mohamed Oshallah 1 , Ramez Borbara 1 , Aristides Konstantopoulos 1

1Ophthalmology,University Hospital Southampton NHS FT,Southampton,United Kingdom

Purpose

Previous studies have used intra-session reliability to estimate measurement error when using scheimpflug tomography to assess keratoconic progression. This fails to account for day-to-day variation in the patient, technician, machine and testing environment. This study aimed to determine inter-session repeatability of several markers of keratoconic progression measured by scheimpflug tomography.

Setting

Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK

Methods

A retrospective study of all keratoconus patients who had a Pentacam® scan performed between 2014 and 2020 at a single tertiary unit with two separate scans performed > 1 day and ≤ 14 days apart. Patients with clinically explainable reason for potential change were excluded. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated for several parameters, including Kmax, topography-derived astigmatism (Cyl), corneal thickness at both the apex (CTapex) and thinnest location (CTmin), as well as anterior and posterior Kmean. MDC is the minimum amount of change needed to for a true change to be considered more likely than that of random measurement error.

Results

45 patients with keratoconus were included in this study (Median age 30; 68.9% Males). Median time between the scans was 13 days. The MDC was found to be 24.66 microns in CTapex and 28.92 microns in CTmin, 2.68D in Cyl, 2.99D in Kmax.

Conclusions

The degree of measurement error estimated was higher than that previously reported by others using intra-session reliability. This likely represents additional noise introduced by day-to-day variation and real-world daily clinical practice. Basing clinical decisions on changes in these markers of progression must be done within the context of this noise.