Dexmetomidine Versus Remifentanil Monitored Anesthesia Care During Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study.
Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO280 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/bx10-2086
Authors: Chiara De Vitto* 1 , Chiara Adembri 2 , Samuela Pierucci 2 , Rita Mencucci 1 , Michela Cennamo 1 , Eleonora Favuzza 1
1Eye Clinic, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence.,FLORENCE,Italy, 2Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and IC, University of Florence– Italy,FLORENCE,Italy
Purpose
Sedation is administered to avoid anxiety or uncontrolled and unexpected movements.
Drugs used sedation during EKs are propofol midazolam, and the opioids remifentanil. Each of these drugs can cause respiratory depression, hypoxemia, and apnea.
Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist with sedative, analgesic and anxiolytic properties with minimal respiratory depression; it decreases intraocular pressure (IOP) and pain during the local anesthetic injection.
The current study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, feasibility and patients’ and surgeons’ satisfaction intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil during EKs.
Setting
Methods
In patients undergoing sedation, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation are always recorded at baseline and every 10 minutes until the end of surgery. The degree of sedation is evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale.
Preoperative evaluation of anxiety disorders is carried out with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), while patients’ and surgeon’s satisfaction is evaluated with the 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale.
Results
Twenty-four (group 1) received a continuous dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion, while 20 (group 2) received remifentanil.
There was no statistically difference in the hemodynamic (HR, SBP, DBP) and respiratory (Sp02, RR) parameters between the two groups before, during and at the end of surgery.
The mean value of Ramsay scale reached with dexdor was 3 (patient co-operative and oriented) and 2 (responds to command only) with remifentanil.
Both patients and surgeons reported higher satisfaction scores with dexdor compared to patients receiving remifentanil (respectively 7 and 7 versus 5 and 4 in the 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale).
Conclusions
With the same stability of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, dexmedetomidine provided deeper sedation than remifentanil without respiratory depression, guaranteeing a better surgical performance in terms of patients’ and surgeon’s satisfaction, thus suggesting a key role in sedation during Ek surgery.