Visual Disturbances Produced After The Implantation Of Three Extended-Depth-Of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Versus One Monofocal Lens
Published 2022 - 40th Congress of the ESCRS
Reference: PO184 | Type: Free paper | DOI: 10.82333/nhsm-9b41
Authors: MERCÈ GUARRO* 1 , IDOIA GONI 2 , GABRIEL LONDONO 1 , ANNA GONI 2 , LAURA SARAROLS 1 , MERITXELL VAZQUEZ 2 , ANNA DAVINS 2
1VALLES OPHTHALMOLOGY RESEARCH - OMIQ,BARCELONA,Spain;HOSPITAL GENERAL DE GRANOLLERS,GRANOLLERS,Spain, 2VALLES OPHTHALMOLOGY RESEARCH - OMIQ,BARCELONA,Spain
Purpose
three extended depth of focus IOLs or a monofocal IOL as the control.
Setting
OMIQ Institute of Ophthalmology -Vallès Ophthalmolgoy Research. Barcelona.
Methods
IQ Vivity® (Group Vivity), AT LARA 829MO® (Group AT Lara) or TECNIS® Symfony
ZXR00 (Group Symfony), and the monofocal lens Acrysof IQ® SN60WF (Group
Monofocal). The variables analyzed were the light distortion index (LDI), best-fit circle
radius (BFCRad) and self-reported vision quality with a questionnaire (QoV). Outcomes
were evaluated at the 3 month follow up visit.
Results
for the LDI and BFCRad. Under binocular conditions, significant differences in both
variables were produced. Monofocal group reported better values than Symfony® (p=
0.025; p=0.024) and AT Lara® (p=0.002; p=0.002) groups. Vivity® group reported
better values than Symfony® (p=0.015; p=0.014) and AT Lara® (p=0.001; p=0.001)
groups. Halos were never reported by 81.8% (18) of patients receiving the Vivity® IOL
and neither were halos noted by over 90% (20) of patients implanted with the
monofocal lens, while 50% (11) of patients fitted with AT Lara® and around 60% (13)
of those with Symfony® did not perceive them.
Conclusions
study induced similar visual disturbances, which were nevertheless worse than those
produced by the non-diffractive extended-range model and the monofocal one. The
non-diffractive lens and the monofocal one, did not show differences.