ESCRS - Add-On IOLs Bring Added Benefits ;

Add-On IOLs Bring Added Benefits

Primary and secondary implantation procedures offer advantages to alternatives.

Add-On IOLs Bring Added Benefits
Cheryl Guttman Krader
Cheryl Guttman Krader
Published: Thursday, March 2, 2023
“ Published data from clinical and cadaver eye studies show the add-on IOLs are associated with good refractive outcomes and safety profiles. “

Supplementary (“add-on”) IOLs designed for implantation into the sulcus provide a reversible solution for refractive enhancement after cataract surgery or when implanted during the primary surgery in a “duet” procedure to correct presbyopia, Oliver Findl MD told a recent conference.

Polypseudophakia was first described in 1993 and involved piggybacking a second standard IOL in the capsular bag to treat high hyperopia. However, postoperative problems such as interlenticular membrane formation—with opacification and hyperopic defocus—meant a second IOL placement into the ciliary sulcus. But this technique was done using an IOL intended for implantation in the capsular bag, which resulted in complications including pigment dispersion, inflammation, elevated IOP, and haemorrhage.

“The idea then emerged to design an IOL optimised for sulcus implantation into the pseudophakic eye,” Dr Findl explained.

Currently, there are three commercially available add-on IOL models for refractive indications: Reverso (Cristalens), Sulco­ flex (Rayner), and 1stQ AddOn (Medicontour). All are made of biocompatible hydrophilic acrylic and feature a 6.5-mm optic that gives good overlap with the IOL in the bag while avoiding iris optic capture. In addition, they have round optic edges to minimise dysphotopsia risk, a concave posterior surface to avoid contact with the IOL in the bag, and haptics designed to provide good centration, rotational stability, and uveal clearance. Available optic designs include aspheric monofocal, refractive and diffractive multifocal, toric, and multifocal toric.

Published data from clinical and cadaver eye studies show the add-on IOLs are associated with good refractive outcomes and safety profiles. A study of the Sulcoflex IOL showed its centration was better than that of the in-the-bag IOL. A bench study comparing optical quality of a single trifocal in-the-bag IOL with a trifocal add-on IOL plus an in-the-bag monofocal IOL found no difference between the two systems.

Consistent with the good visual outcomes, studies evaluating the add-on IOLs also show good and stable centration. However, a study of eyes implanted with a toric add-on IOL found rotation in 10% of cases.

“A toric add-on IOL can be suture fixated in the sulcus. However, this is a little tricky, and surgeons would prefer not to have to do that,” Dr Findl said.

Surgical planning and performance

In cases of secondary implantation to correct postoperative ametropia ±7.0 D of target, the IOL power calculation is simple as the patient’s current refraction can serve as the base, he noted. The patient’s spherical equivalent is multiplied by 1.5 in cases of hyperopia or by a factor of 1.2 for myopia. The R-vergence formula, which incorporates values for keratometry and anterior chamber depth in addition to the spherical equivalent, can serve as an alternative.

Dr Findl observed implanting the add-on IOL is also straightforward. In a duet procedure, after the primary IOL is implanted into the bag and viscoelastic removed from inside the capsule bag, more viscoelastic is placed under the iris to open the sulcus. An injector or forceps delivers the add-on IOL through a 2.4-mm or slightly smaller incision. Once positioned, viscoelastic is aspirated, with special attention directed to removing the material from the interface between the two lenses.

Implanting an add-on IOL in a secondary procedure to correct ametropia or explanting or exchanging an existing add-on IOL are also easier and less risky procedures than exchanging an IOL in the capsular bag.

“If a patient with a multifocal add-on IOL is troubled early on by dysphotopsia or a lack of neuroadaptation, surgeons simply need to reopen the incision and remove the lens,” Dr Findl said. “The add-on lens can also be easily removed years later if needed because of pathological changes, such as the development of age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular oedema.”

Dr Findl presented during the AAO 2022 Refractive Surgery Subspecialty Day meeting in Chicago, US. He spoke on behalf of Michael Amon MD, PhD, Vienna, Austria, inventor of a commercially available add-on IOL platform.

Oliver Findl MD is the Chair of the Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. He is current president of the ESCRS.

Michael Amon MD, PhD is Head of the Department of Ophthalmology Academic Teaching Hospital of St. John Chair for Ophthalmology at Sigmund Freud Private-University in Vienna, Austria.

Latest Articles
Finding a Keratoconus Consensus

Evolving new consensus should help guide diagnosis and management.


Ray of a New Dawn in Corneal Infection Research

Will UVC light the way as a potential treatment for microbial keratitis?


Towards a More Inclusive Ophthalmology

The only way to face challenges to inclusivity and equity is to work together without barriers.


Refractive Femtosecond Laser

There are many different femtosecond laser surgical platforms to choose from, and it can be hard to keep them all straight. We have prepared a table allowing you to compare these at a glance, along with some comments from some of our members who use these lasers regularly.


Survey Informing New Leadership and Business Programmes in 2024

A year-round programme will complement Leadership and Business Innovation Day at the 2024 Annual Congress.


Overcoming Obstacles to Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs

New technology can smooth the path to premium IOL acceptance.


The Power of Four

Finding uses for corneal lenticules, once considered a waste product.


Alternative to Penetrating Keratoplasty

Cornea findings and comorbidities considered in surgical decisions for endothelial dysfunction.


Flexing Four-Flanged Scleral Fixation

Study results reveal 80% of patients end up with good refractive outcomes.


New Approach to Keratoconus

Corneal regeneration with lenticule implantation.